Jerramy said:
You can set them individually. By keeping X at 128 and setting Y to 96, you will stretch a 240 x 320 app to perfectly fit your screen.
When I first discovered these registry settings, I though “I have a 320 screen, I'll set them both to 320.” BIG MISTAKE. What would normally take up an inch of space on the screen instead took up the whole screen (the values are dots per inch). Most of my screen was the Start and Menu bar. I -was- able to get PHM Registry Editor open again, but then couldn't navigate around, and ended up clicking the wrong thing I think and screwing my my registry.
I had to Hard Reset to fix it. You could probably recover from going the other way though. Setting small values makes it look like you've got a HUGE desktop (but everything's tiny).
The main problem seems to be that some fonts and icons don't have a valid version of the new DPI, and so something bogus gets displayed. When I changed only my Y setting, it seemed like most icons worked fine, thouh they looked a little squished.
And some program do direct draws to the screen, making it nearly impossible to fix. Also, to do this change, you have to perform a soft reset, which takes forever (if only there were a way to speed THAT up!).
Would that actually be a good solution though, to stretch displays that were made for 320×240 to fit 320×320? That would mess up the aspect ratio? Watching video, everything would be longer vertically, and look funny. Also, I would assume that would mess up the touch screen, as everything would appear in a different place than expected.
It would make more sense not to use the whole screen, but just enough of it to have the correct aspect ration for 320×240, leaving black empty space at the top or bottom or both.
On a laptop or desktop computer, running XP or Vista, one can set the screen resolution to something lower than the full resolution of that display. Is that not possible on the Epix–to set the 320×320 resolution to 320×240 instead, for apps that require it?
They (both Samsung and Palm) really should have considered backwards compatibility, in creating devices with a new resolution!